CAIN-42 MCPGate

AGENTIC AI 75 · #54

Deployment-driven agent benchmarks

TraceDance converted real deployment traces into targeted behaviour tests.

Last reviewed 2026-11-11

Agentic AI 75 / #54

LIVEMoat 6 · Adversarial Trust EngineBundle · Code & ProofStream 10

2026 status: Reported research system · Category: Evaluation

The 2026 development

TraceDance converted real deployment traces into targeted behaviour tests.

The governance gap

A benchmark built from production traces contains production data and production failures. Using it safely requires consent, redaction, tenant separation and a way to tell whether a failure is still reproducible.

Where CAIN-42 fits: Moat 6 — Adversarial Trust Engine

Core question: Can CAIN break its own guarantees? Continuous attack, mutation and red-team testing of the controls themselves.

Convert signed production records into a redacted, frozen test suite. The suite is an adversarial asset: the agent being tested must not be able to edit it, and every result names the trace it came from.

How the wiring works

  1. Select traces with consent and tenant approval.
  2. Redact secrets and personal data before the trace becomes a test.
  3. Freeze the suite and hash it.
  4. Re-run the frozen suite after every change and record the delta.

What is real today

LIVE A public route in this deployment exercises this mechanism today, within its stated scope.

The hosted release gate evaluates fixed agent behaviour suites. It is not TraceDance and does not use customer traces.

Component in this repositoryWhat the module says it is
keystone/agentci.pyAGENT-CI KEYSTONE: a release gate for AI agents that grades the path, not only the answer.
keystone/evalrun.pySigned evaluation runs: "these scores came from this code, this data, these model providers, unmodified".
cain/runtime/incident.pyCAIN Sovereign — Autonomous Agent Incident Response (Prompt 7, Phase 21).
keystone/heldout.pyHeld-out evaluation vault + contamination certificate, run in the CAIN agent jail, signed.

Descriptions are the first line of each module's own docstring, read without importing it. A module path is a pointer into this repository, not a hosted endpoint. Its existence is checked by the test suite; its status for this use is the label above.

Check it yourself

Commercial package

OfferDeployment Trace Evaluation
BuyerAgent-platform teams and QA organisations
Price (proposal)$3,500–$7,500 per audit
BundleCode & Proof — Prove the fix, not just the diff.
Operator streamStream 10 of the 10-stream operator playbook

Platform engineering, AI coding-tool vendors, security engineering is the bundle buyer. The entry offer for this bundle is Fabrication audit or long-run engineering attestation; the range is $1,500–$6,000 per audit; $2,500–$4,000/month retainer. A price on this page is a proposal, not a validated rate, and no customer is claimed.

Buy this as a product or service

CAIN-A75-054 — Deployment Trace Evaluation PILOT

A bounded pilot report: up to five scenarios, the relevant library engine or analysis, a written result and the stated limits. Engineering time is quoted per pilot.

Kind: Evaluation · Price (proposal): $3,500–$7,500 per audit · Lead time: 10 business days.

Open the product page · all 75 products

What this page does not claim

What this page is not. CAIN-42 is not affiliated with, endorsed by, integrated into, or shipped with the organisation named in the 2026 item. The item is public context; the page describes how CAIN-42 would govern that class of capability. No page here claims a customer, a partnership, a certification, a patent, or a production integration. Prices are proposals. Built by a three-person team.

← #53 Consumer agents connected to real servicesAll 75#55 Multi-session memory evaluation →