CAIN-42 MCPGateAGENTIC AI 75 · #50
Banking detection of agent activity
BioCatch AiRE aimed to distinguish agent-driven interactions using behavioural and infrastructure signals.
Last reviewed 2026-11-11
Agentic AI 75 / #50
2026 status: Product launch · Category: Financial security
The 2026 development
BioCatch AiRE aimed to distinguish agent-driven interactions using behavioural and infrastructure signals.
The governance gap
Detection is not authorisation. A bank that can tell an agent is present still needs to know whether that agent holds a valid mandate for this account and this transaction.
Where CAIN-42 fits: Moat 1 — Trust State
Core question: Who do we trust right now? Evidence-backed trust computed at the moment of the action, never a static badge.
Combine behavioural risk with cryptographic authority: a high trust score cannot substitute for a missing mandate, and a valid mandate cannot bypass a fraud hold.
How the wiring works
- Score the interaction for agent and fraud signals.
- Check the mandate and the account authority separately.
- Require both a passing score and a valid mandate.
- Record the signals used without storing sensitive raw behaviour.
What is real today
LIBRARY Production code and tests exist in this repository; there is no hosted route for this exact use.
Fingerprint and mandate code exist. No bank deployment or BioCatch integration exists.
| Component in this repository | What the module says it is |
|---|---|
cain/runtime/fingerprint.py | CAIN Sovereign — Agent Behavioural Fingerprint (Prompt 7, Phase 10). |
cain/commerce/mandate_guard.py | Agent Payment Mandate Guard. |
cain/telemetry.py | CAIN Trust Fabric - Enterprise SIEM & SOC Telemetry Connectors (Phase 3) |
Descriptions are the first line of each module's own docstring, read without importing it. A module path is a pointer into this repository, not a hosted endpoint. Its existence is checked by the test suite; its status for this use is the label above.
Check it yourself
- Run the live payment-mandate demo
/api/v1/payment-mandate-guard/presets - Fire a live decision through the CAIN-42 pipeline
/fabric/try— the same enforcement path every product sits behind.
Commercial package
| Offer | Agent Interaction Risk Review |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Banks and fraud-prevention vendors |
| Price (proposal) | $5,000–$12,000 per review |
| Bundle | Identity & Authority — Every agent, every delegation, every boundary. |
| Operator stream | Stream 2 of the 10-stream operator playbook |
CISO, IAM, platform security, agent-tool vendors is the bundle buyer. The entry offer for this bundle is Agent authority review; MCP/A2A boundary review; the range is $2,500–$7,500 per review; integration from $10,000. A price on this page is a proposal, not a validated rate, and no customer is claimed.
Buy this as a product or service
CAIN-A75-050 — Agent Interaction Risk Review PILOT
A bounded pilot report: up to five scenarios, the relevant library engine or analysis, a written result and the stated limits. Engineering time is quoted per pilot.
Kind: Assessment · Price (proposal): $5,000–$12,000 per review · Lead time: 10 business days.
Open the product page · all 75 products
What this page does not claim
What this page is not. CAIN-42 is not affiliated with, endorsed by, integrated into, or shipped with the organisation named in the 2026 item. The item is public context; the page describes how CAIN-42 would govern that class of capability. No page here claims a customer, a partnership, a certification, a patent, or a production integration. Prices are proposals. Built by a three-person team.