CAIN-42 MCPGateAGENTIC AI 75 · #43
Agentic construction scheduling
Trimble connected construction schedules to live jobsite data, weather, RFIs and submittals.
Last reviewed 2026-11-11
Agentic AI 75 / #43
2026 status: Product announcement · Category: Construction
The 2026 development
Trimble connected construction schedules to live jobsite data, weather, RFIs and submittals.
The governance gap
A schedule change has cost and safety consequences. An agent reacting to live data needs a model of dependencies and a stop before it moves a safety-critical or contractual milestone.
Where CAIN-42 fits: Moat 5 — Predictive Trust & Blast Radius
Core question: What could happen before we let it happen? Pre-execution analysis of reach, exposure and consequence, including simulations.
Model the schedule as a dependency graph and simulate a proposed change before it is committed. Cost, safety and contractual impact are computed, not inferred from prose.
How the wiring works
- Load the current schedule and dependency graph.
- Simulate the proposed change and compute impact.
- Block changes that move a safety or contractual milestone without approval.
- Record the change, the simulation and the approver.
What is real today
PROPOSED A design mapping only. No dedicated implementation exists yet; do not buy this as a finished control.
No construction schedule, jobsite feed or Trimble integration exists here. This is a blast-radius design, not a deployed scheduler.
| Component in this repository | What the module says it is |
|---|---|
cain/cain_digital_twin.py | CAIN Trust Fabric - CAIN Digital Twin & Blast-Radius Counterfactual Emulator |
cain/argus/path.py | CAIN ARGUS — execution-path assurance (Prompt 14, section 7). |
cain/causality/graph.py | CAIN CAUSALITY — Causal Event Graph (Prompt CAUSALITY, Phase 3). |
Descriptions are the first line of each module's own docstring, read without importing it. A module path is a pointer into this repository, not a hosted endpoint. Its existence is checked by the test suite; its status for this use is the label above.
Check it yourself
- Inspect the live ARGUS status
/fabric/argus/status - Fire a live decision through the CAIN-42 pipeline
/fabric/try— the same enforcement path every product sits behind.
Commercial package
| Offer | Physical Schedule Assurance Review |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Construction-technology vendors and contractors |
| Price (proposal) | Advisory from $10,000 |
| Bundle | Physical & Lab — A validity check between the plan and the machine. |
| Operator stream | Stream 2 of the 10-stream operator playbook |
Lab automation, robotics, industrial operations, construction technology is the bundle buyer. The entry offer for this bundle is Physical-action assurance review (advisory, simulation-first); the range is $5,000–$15,000 per engagement. A price on this page is a proposal, not a validated rate, and no customer is claimed.
Buy this as a product or service
CAIN-A75-043 — Physical Schedule Assurance Review DESIGN
A design-partner statement of work and architecture: authority boundaries, evidence points, and a build plan. No control is delivered and no integration is claimed.
Kind: Assessment · Price (proposal): Advisory from $10,000 · Lead time: 15 business days.
Open the product page · all 75 products
What this page does not claim
What this page is not. CAIN-42 is not affiliated with, endorsed by, integrated into, or shipped with the organisation named in the 2026 item. The item is public context; the page describes how CAIN-42 would govern that class of capability. No page here claims a customer, a partnership, a certification, a patent, or a production integration. Prices are proposals. Built by a three-person team.